.png)
GAAP and tax basis represent two different accounting methods for construction companies. GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) requires accrual accounting with percentage-of-completion revenue recognition for long-term contracts. Tax basis follows IRS rules, allowing cash or accrual methods with revenue recognized when received or work completes. This matters because contractors need GAAP for bonding and bank financing, while tax basis simplifies compliance and reduces accounting costs for smaller firms.
Construction accounting presents unique challenges. Projects span months or years, creating revenue recognition complexity. Equipment purchases involve significant capital requiring depreciation decisions. Most contractors maintain different books for financial reporting versus tax filing.
GAAP (established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board) provides consistent financial reporting standards, matching revenue with expenses when work occurs. Banks, sureties, and investors rely on GAAP statements because methodology remains consistent across companies. Tax basis follows Internal Revenue Code requirements optimized for calculating federal income tax liability, typically showing higher taxable income than GAAP net income.
Public construction companies must use GAAP per SEC requirements. Private contractors choose based on stakeholder needs—surety companies underwriting performance bonds typically require GAAP, as do banks lending working capital lines for covenant compliance.
Revenue recognition creates the most significant difference between GAAP and tax basis. GAAP requires percentage-of-completion for long-term construction contracts, recognizing revenue based on project progress rather than cash collection or billing.
Calculate percentage-of-completion using costs incurred divided by total estimated costs. If a contractor incurs $600,000 on a $1 million contract with $800,000 estimated total costs, the project is 75% complete—recognize $750,000 revenue regardless of billing. This creates contract assets (unbilled receivables) or contract liabilities (deferred revenue) that fluctuate as work progresses.
Tax basis typically recognizes revenue under completed contract method or when cash is received. Completed contract defers all revenue until project completion. Cash basis records revenue when payments arrive. Both create timing differences versus GAAP.
For contractors managing job costing systems, understanding cash versus accrual accounting differences becomes critical for accurate financial reporting.
Equipment depreciation differs substantially between GAAP and tax basis. GAAP requires straight-line depreciation over assets' estimated useful lives. A $100,000 excavator with 10-year useful life and $10,000 salvage value depreciates $9,000 annually.
Tax basis uses Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) per IRS Code Section 168. MACRS assigns shorter recovery periods and applies accelerated methods. The same $100,000 excavator qualifies for 5-year MACRS with first-year depreciation of $20,000.
Section 179 expensing and bonus depreciation further accelerate tax deductions. Contractors can immediately expense up to $1,220,000 (2025 limit) under Section 179. Bonus depreciation allows additional first-year deductions at 40% for 2025. These differences create significant book-tax disparities—GAAP net income appears higher than taxable income early in equipment ownership.
Lease accounting represents major divergence between GAAP and tax basis. GAAP follows ASC 842, requiring lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on balance sheets for leases exceeding 12 months. Calculate the right-of-use asset as present value of lease payments using the incremental borrowing rate.
A 5-year equipment lease at $2,000 monthly with 6% discount rate creates roughly $100,000 right-of-use asset and lease liability. Recognize rent expense on straight-line basis over the lease term. Tax basis treats operating leases simply as rent expense when payments occur—no balance sheet recognition for lease obligations.
This creates material differences for contractors with significant equipment leases. GAAP balance sheets show substantially higher assets and liabilities than tax basis statements. ASC 842 complexity requires specialized software or spreadsheets, often becoming the biggest GAAP implementation challenge.
Tax basis accounting costs 30-50% less than GAAP preparation. Tax basis leverages work performed for federal tax returns, minimizing duplicate effort. GAAP requires monthly percentage-of-completion calculations, robust job costing systems, and careful cost tracking.
Audit costs differ substantially. GAAP audits for mid-size contractors run $15,000-$50,000 annually. Tax basis reviews cost $8,000-$25,000 because fewer principles require testing and footnotes are minimal.
However, choosing tax basis may limit financing. Banks often reject tax basis for construction lines exceeding $2-5 million. Sureties rarely accept tax basis for bonding contractors bidding projects above $10 million. Savings from simpler accounting may cost more in restricted growth opportunities.
When evaluating costs, construction firms should consider the ROI of outsourcing accounting functions to reduce overhead while maintaining GAAP compliance.
Contractors typically convert when growth requires external financing or bonding capacity increases. Common triggers include seeking bank credit exceeding $5 million, pursuing bonding for projects above $10 million, or preparing for sale to strategic buyers.
Conversion requires adjusting the opening balance sheet—implementing percentage-of-completion for in-progress contracts, recognizing lease assets and liabilities, accruing expenses, establishing receivable reserves, and adjusting depreciation to straight-line. Most contractors need 8-12 weeks with CPA support.
Subsequent monthly closes take longer under GAAP—typically 2-4 additional days per month. Many contractors implement new accounting software for job costing and percentage-of-completion tracking. Convert before fiscal year-end to avoid restating prior-year statements.
For firms scaling operations, deciding when to outsource versus hire in-house becomes critical during this transition.
Beyond revenue recognition and depreciation, several areas differ. GAAP requires allowances for doubtful accounts, estimating uncollectible receivables. Tax basis deducts bad debts only when specific accounts are deemed worthless.
Asset impairment testing under GAAP requires assessing whether long-lived assets' carrying values remain recoverable. Tax basis doesn't require impairment analysis. Warranty reserves also differ—GAAP accrues estimated costs when revenue is recognized, while tax basis deducts when repairs occur.
Retainage creates unique challenges. GAAP includes retainage in accounts receivable when earned through percentage-of-completion. Tax basis may defer recognizing retainage until collection becomes certain, depending on the elected method.
For contractors navigating these complexities, partnering with offshore accounting teams experienced in construction provides technical expertise while controlling costs.
GAAP requires accrual accounting with percentage-of-completion revenue recognition. Tax basis allows cash or accrual methods with revenue recognized when received or work completes. GAAP uses straight-line depreciation over useful lives while tax basis uses MACRS accelerated depreciation, resulting in higher early tax deductions.
Construction companies need GAAP when seeking bonding, bank financing, or investor funding. Publicly traded contractors must use GAAP per SEC requirements. Private contractors under $25 million revenue often use tax basis unless lenders require GAAP for covenant compliance.
Percentage-of-completion recognizes revenue based on project progress rather than billing. Calculate progress using costs incurred divided by total estimated costs. If a project is 60% complete with $1 million contract value, recognize $600,000 revenue regardless of billing.
Yes, companies can convert when growth requires it. The process requires adjusting opening balance sheet for percentage-of-completion, lease assets under ASC 842, accrued expenses, and depreciation differences. Most contractors need 8-12 weeks with CPA support.
GAAP requires recognizing right-of-use assets and lease liabilities under ASC 842 with straight-line rent expense. Tax basis treats leases as operating expenses when paid. This creates significant balance sheet differences for companies with equipment leases.
Under GAAP, use straight-line over useful life (5-10 years for equipment). Tax basis uses MACRS with accelerated depreciation per IRS schedules. Equipment costing $100,000 might depreciate $10,000 annually under GAAP but $20,000-$35,000 first year under MACRS.
Tax basis costs 30-50% less than GAAP. GAAP requires percentage-of-completion calculations, lease tracking, and impairment testing. Audit fees for GAAP run $15,000-$50,000 annually for mid-size contractors versus $8,000-$25,000 for tax basis reviews.
Yes. Madras Accountancy provides offshore support for U.S. construction companies. Our team handles percentage-of-completion calculations, GAAP conversions, and job costing. Since 2015, we've processed construction accounting for 200+ clients, reducing overhead 40%.
Construction companies face strategic choices between GAAP and tax basis driven by growth stage, financing needs, and bonding requirements. GAAP provides consistent financial statements but requires sophisticated systems and higher costs. Tax basis simplifies reporting and reduces fees but may limit capital access.
Contractors often start with tax basis and convert to GAAP when revenue exceeds $10-15 million. Madras Accountancy supports U.S. construction companies with offshore expertise in percentage-of-completion, GAAP conversions, and construction financial reporting. Since 2015, we've processed construction accounting for 200+ clients, reducing overhead 40%.
.png)
November 12, 2025
Plan your exit with real estate modeling strategies. Maximize returns using 7 proven methods for property disposition.
.png)
November 12, 2025
Compare CPA retainer plans for real estate investors. Get year-round tax planning and save thousands in 2025.
